Scheduler core with period keys and catch-up (Feature 20) #171
@@ -26,9 +26,13 @@
|
||||
// # Claim failures
|
||||
//
|
||||
// A claim that fails (the database refused the insert) is never skipped:
|
||||
// the scheduler logs it and does not advance past it, but repeats the
|
||||
// whole pass every ClaimRetry until the claim succeeds. Periods the pass
|
||||
// already claimed are claimed again and skipped, so each still runs once.
|
||||
// the scheduler logs it and keeps that period's fire time, and every
|
||||
// ClaimRetry claims that same period again until the claim succeeds. Only
|
||||
// then does it apply the catch-up rule to it, running it if its fire time
|
||||
// is within CatchUpWindow of the successful claim and recording it as
|
||||
// missed otherwise, and only then does it go on to later fire times, even
|
||||
// when one has passed meanwhile. Each period is claimed by its own fire
|
||||
// time, so the later period runs once as well.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// # Time zone and DST
|
||||
//
|
||||
@@ -351,36 +355,37 @@ func compile(schedules []Schedule, settings household.Settings) (*plan, error) {
|
||||
|
||||
// loop fires schedules until ctx is cancelled. done is the instant up to
|
||||
// which fire times have been handled; it starts at the zero time so the
|
||||
// first pass catches up. Each pass first applies the pending settings
|
||||
// changes in order, handling fire times up to a change under the plan it
|
||||
// replaces, then handles fire times up to now under the current plan. A
|
||||
// pass with a failed claim keeps done and its unapplied changes where they
|
||||
// were and is repeated after ClaimRetry.
|
||||
// first pass catches up. retry is the periods whose claim failed, each
|
||||
// with its own fire time. Each pass first claims retry again; while any
|
||||
// claim there still fails, the pass stops and is repeated after
|
||||
// ClaimRetry. Otherwise it applies the pending settings changes in order,
|
||||
// handling fire times up to a change under the plan it replaces, then
|
||||
// handles fire times up to now under the current plan, stopping after the
|
||||
// first stretch in which a claim failed.
|
||||
func (s *Scheduler) loop(ctx context.Context, p *plan) {
|
||||
var done time.Time
|
||||
var pending []change
|
||||
var retry []target
|
||||
for {
|
||||
now := s.now()
|
||||
pending = append(pending, s.takeChanges()...)
|
||||
failed := false
|
||||
for len(pending) > 0 {
|
||||
retry = s.retry(ctx, retry, now)
|
||||
for len(retry) == 0 && len(pending) > 0 {
|
||||
c := pending[0]
|
||||
if c.at.After(done) {
|
||||
if p != nil && !s.fire(ctx, p, done, c.at, now) {
|
||||
failed = true
|
||||
break
|
||||
if p != nil {
|
||||
retry = s.fire(ctx, p, done, c.at, now)
|
||||
}
|
||||
done = c.at
|
||||
}
|
||||
p = s.compileChange(ctx, c.settings)
|
||||
pending = pending[1:]
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !failed {
|
||||
if p == nil || s.fire(ctx, p, done, now, now) {
|
||||
done = now
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
failed = true
|
||||
if len(retry) == 0 {
|
||||
if p != nil {
|
||||
retry = s.fire(ctx, p, done, now, now)
|
||||
}
|
||||
done = now
|
||||
}
|
||||
if ctx.Err() != nil {
|
||||
return
|
||||
@@ -388,7 +393,7 @@ func (s *Scheduler) loop(ctx context.Context, p *plan) {
|
||||
|
||||
var timeout <-chan time.Time
|
||||
switch {
|
||||
case failed:
|
||||
case len(retry) > 0:
|
||||
timeout = s.after(ClaimRetry)
|
||||
case p != nil:
|
||||
if next, ok := p.next(now); ok {
|
||||
@@ -418,31 +423,54 @@ func (s *Scheduler) compileChange(ctx context.Context, settings household.Settin
|
||||
return p
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// target is one schedule's period, named by the fire time it belongs to.
|
||||
type target struct {
|
||||
it item
|
||||
loc *time.Location
|
||||
at time.Time
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// fire handles, for every schedule, its most recent fire time at or before
|
||||
// until if it is after done; now is the current instant. It reports false
|
||||
// when a claim failed, so the fire times it covered must be handled again.
|
||||
func (s *Scheduler) fire(ctx context.Context, p *plan, done, until, now time.Time) bool {
|
||||
ok := true
|
||||
// until if it is after done; now is the current instant. It returns the
|
||||
// targets whose claim failed, to be claimed again.
|
||||
func (s *Scheduler) fire(ctx context.Context, p *plan, done, until, now time.Time) []target {
|
||||
var failed []target
|
||||
for _, it := range p.items {
|
||||
if ctx.Err() != nil {
|
||||
return ok
|
||||
return failed
|
||||
}
|
||||
at, due := fireBefore(it.rule, p.loc, until)
|
||||
if !due || !at.After(done) {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !s.handle(ctx, it, p.loc, at, now) {
|
||||
ok = false
|
||||
if t := (target{it: it, loc: p.loc, at: at}); !s.handle(ctx, t, now) {
|
||||
failed = append(failed, t)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return ok
|
||||
return failed
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// handle claims the period of it fired at at and runs it, or records it as
|
||||
// missed when at is more than CatchUpWindow before now. It reports false
|
||||
// retry handles targets again at now and returns those whose claim still
|
||||
// failed.
|
||||
func (s *Scheduler) retry(ctx context.Context, targets []target, now time.Time) []target {
|
||||
var failed []target
|
||||
for i, t := range targets {
|
||||
if ctx.Err() != nil {
|
||||
return append(failed, targets[i:]...)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !s.handle(ctx, t, now) {
|
||||
failed = append(failed, t)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return failed
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// handle claims the period of t and runs it, or records it as missed when
|
||||
// its fire time is more than CatchUpWindow before now. It reports false
|
||||
// when the claim failed and the period is still unclaimed.
|
||||
func (s *Scheduler) handle(ctx context.Context, it item, loc *time.Location, at, now time.Time) bool {
|
||||
date := household.Today(at, loc)
|
||||
func (s *Scheduler) handle(ctx context.Context, t target, now time.Time) bool {
|
||||
it, at := t.it, t.at
|
||||
date := household.Today(at, t.loc)
|
||||
period := Period{Key: it.rule.PeriodKey(date), FireAt: at, Date: date}
|
||||
if it.rule.NextWeek {
|
||||
period.Week = household.WeekStart(addDays(date, 7))
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -603,9 +603,9 @@ func TestSettingsChangeAppliedLateStillFires(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
wantKeys(t, "claims", e.claimed(scheduler.DayOfReminder), []string{"2026-10-06", "2026-10-07"})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// A claim that fails is retried, not skipped, and the period then runs once.
|
||||
func TestClaimFailureIsRetried(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
e := newEnv(t)
|
||||
// failClaims makes every claim fail until recover is called.
|
||||
func (e *env) failClaims() (recover func()) {
|
||||
e.t.Helper()
|
||||
for _, q := range []string{
|
||||
`CREATE TABLE fail_claims (on_ INTEGER NOT NULL)`,
|
||||
`INSERT INTO fail_claims VALUES (1)`,
|
||||
@@ -614,9 +614,21 @@ func TestClaimFailureIsRetried(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
BEGIN SELECT RAISE(ABORT, 'injected claim failure'); END`,
|
||||
} {
|
||||
if _, err := e.st.Writer.Exec(q); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||||
e.t.Fatal(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return func() {
|
||||
e.t.Helper()
|
||||
if _, err := e.st.Writer.Exec(`UPDATE fail_claims SET on_ = 0`); err != nil {
|
||||
e.t.Fatal(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// A claim that fails is retried, not skipped, and the period then runs once.
|
||||
func TestClaimFailureIsRetried(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
e := newEnv(t)
|
||||
recoverClaims := e.failClaims()
|
||||
var rec recorder
|
||||
r := e.start(at(2026, 10, 7, 12, 0), reminder(&rec))
|
||||
wantKeys(t, "boot with failing claims", rec.keys(), nil)
|
||||
@@ -625,9 +637,7 @@ func TestClaimFailureIsRetried(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("next wake %s, want a retry after %s", next, scheduler.ClaimRetry)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if _, err := e.st.Writer.Exec(`UPDATE fail_claims SET on_ = 0`); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
recoverClaims()
|
||||
r.runUntil(at(2026, 10, 7, 12, 0).Add(scheduler.ClaimRetry))
|
||||
wantKeys(t, "after the retry", rec.keys(), []string{"2026-10-06"})
|
||||
r.runUntil(at(2026, 10, 7, 23, 0))
|
||||
@@ -635,6 +645,30 @@ func TestClaimFailureIsRetried(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
wantKeys(t, "claims", e.claimed(scheduler.DayOfReminder), []string{"2026-10-06", "2026-10-07"})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// A claim that keeps failing past the next daily fire is retried for its
|
||||
// own period, not the most recent one: that period, now more than
|
||||
// CatchUpWindow old, is recorded as missed, and the later period runs once.
|
||||
func TestClaimFailureRecoversAfterNextFire(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
e := newEnv(t)
|
||||
recoverClaims := e.failClaims()
|
||||
var rec recorder
|
||||
// The 7 October 16:30 reminder is due and its claim fails, past the
|
||||
// 8 October 16:30 fire.
|
||||
r := e.start(at(2026, 10, 7, 16, 45), reminder(&rec))
|
||||
r.runUntil(at(2026, 10, 8, 17, 0))
|
||||
wantKeys(t, "runs while failing", rec.keys(), nil)
|
||||
wantKeys(t, "claims while failing", e.claimed(scheduler.DayOfReminder), nil)
|
||||
|
||||
// Claims recover 24h31m after the 7 October fire.
|
||||
recoverClaims()
|
||||
r.runUntil(at(2026, 10, 8, 17, 1))
|
||||
wantKeys(t, "after recovery", rec.keys(), []string{"2026-10-08"})
|
||||
wantKeys(t, "claims after recovery", e.claimed(scheduler.DayOfReminder), []string{"2026-10-07", "2026-10-08"})
|
||||
|
||||
r.runUntil(at(2026, 10, 9, 16, 0))
|
||||
wantKeys(t, "next day", rec.keys(), []string{"2026-10-08"})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestSettingsChangeTimezone(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
e := newEnv(t)
|
||||
var rec recorder
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user